web3wagmi
← All standards

EIP-7495 SSZ ProgressiveContainer

ReviewCorecreated 2023-08-187 later proposals build on itrequires EIP-7916

SSZ type for forward-compatible containers

Authors: Etan Kissling (@etan-status), Cayman (@wemeetagain)

Depends on (1)

Proposals this one names in its requires field.

EIP-7916SSZ ProgressiveList

Built on by (7)

Later proposals that name this one in their requires field.

EIP-6404SSZ transactionsEIP-6465SSZ withdrawals rootEIP-6466SSZ receiptsEIP-7688Forward compatible consensus data structuresEIP-7807SSZ execution blocksEIP-7919Pureth MetaEIP-8016SSZ CompatibleUnion

What the specification covers

AbstractMotivationSpecificationProgressiveContainer(active_fields)SerializationDeserializationJSON mappingMerkleizationRationaleWhy is active_fields limited to 256 bits?Why is empty ProgressiveContainer an illegal type?Optional[type]?Backwards CompatibilityTest CasesReference ImplementationSecurity ConsiderationsCopyright

This proposal declares no Solidity interface, so there is nothing to compute. It may be a core protocol change, a meta proposal, or written in prose only.

Compare with

Parsed from the canonical specification · discussion