web3wagmi
← All standards

EIP-7251 Increase the MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE

FinalCorecreated 2023-06-287 later proposals build on itrequires EIP-7002, EIP-7685

Allow validators to have larger effective balances, while maintaining the 32 ETH lower bound.

Authors: mike (@michaelneuder), Francesco (@fradamt), dapplion (@dapplion), Mikhail (@mkalinin), Aditya (@adiasg), Justin (@justindrake), lightclient (@lightclient), Felix Lange (@fjl)

Depends on (2)

Proposals this one names in its requires field.

EIP-7002Execution layer triggerable withdrawalsEIP-7685General purpose execution layer requests

Built on by (7)

Later proposals that name this one in their requires field.

EIP-7600Hardfork Meta - PectraEIP-8025Optional Execution ProofsEIP-8061Increase exit and consolidation churnEIP-8062Add sweep withdrawal fee for 0x01 validatorsEIP-8068Neutral effective balance designEIP-8148Custom sweep threshold for validatorsEIP-8222Lean Staking

What the specification covers

AbstractMotivationSpecificationConstantsExecution layerConsensus layerExecution layerConsolidation requestConsolidation request contractAdd Consolidation RequestFee calculationFee GetterSystem CallBytecodeDeploymentConsensus layerRationaleIncreasing the MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE, while creating a MIN_ACTIVATION_BALANCEAllowing for multiple validator indices to be combined through the protocolAdding execution layer partial withdrawals (part of [EIP-7002](./eip-7002.md))Making the initial slashing penalty negligibleConsolidation contract parameter valuesBackwards CompatibilitySecurity ConsiderationsSecurity of attestation committeesAggregator selectionProposer selection probabilitySync committee selection probabilityChurn invariantsFee OverpaymentConsolidation queue hard limitSystem Call failureEmpty Code failureCopyright

This proposal declares no Solidity interface, so there is nothing to compute. It may be a core protocol change, a meta proposal, or written in prose only.

Compare with

Parsed from the canonical specification · discussion