ERC-926 vs ERC-927
Address metadata registry compared with Generalised authorisations.
No shared functions
0 shared · 2 vs 3 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
ERC-927 lists ERC-926 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-926 (2)
0xfbaf094a | provider(address) |
0xcfd8d6c0 | setProvider(address) |
▶️ Only in ERC-927 (3)
0x80a4ec3f | authoriseCaller(address,address,address,bytes4) |
0xdf595cb8 | canCall(address,address,address,bytes4) |
0x048e46f6 | revokeCaller(address,address,address,bytes4) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-926 · ERC-927