ERC-8179 vs ERC-8180

Blob Space Segments compared with Blob Authenticated Messaging.

No shared functions

0 shared · 4 vs 16 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-8180 lists ERC-8179 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0x162e0825`	`declareBlobSegment(uint256,uint16,uint16,bytes32)`
`0xd05a5c48`	`declareBlobSegments((uint256,uint16,uint16,bytes32)[])`
`0x98e24187`	`getSegments(bytes32,uint256,uint256)`
`0xf35b9f89`	`segmentCount(bytes32)`

`0xe5c5e9a3`	`decode(bytes)`
`0x93790f44`	`getKey(address)`
`0x7ffb5473`	`isExposed(bytes32)`
`0xc3c5a547`	`isRegistered(address)`
`0x23fc48c1`	`pubKeySize()`
`0xa3747fef`	`register(bytes,bytes)`
`0xe5aa85f6`	`registerBlobBatch(uint256,uint16,uint16,bytes32,address,address)`
`0x6e71d134`	`registerBlobBatches((uint256,uint16,uint16,bytes32,address,address)[])`
`0x23bfc67d`	`registerCalldataBatch(bytes,bytes32,address,address)`
`0x42df20fb`	`schemeId()`
`0xc45ff281`	`schemeName()`
`0xcf114219`	`signatureSize()`
`0xda5f7811`	`supportsAggregation()`
`0x024ad318`	`verify(bytes,bytes32,bytes)`
`0x28240000`	`verifyAggregated(bytes[],bytes32[],bytes)`
`0xa1f0f8de`	`verifyWithRegisteredKey(address,bytes32,bytes)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-8179 · ERC-8180