ERC-8001 vs ERC-8107
Agent Coordination Framework compared with ENS Trust Registry for Agent Coordination.
No shared functions
0 shared · 4 vs 7 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
ERC-8107 lists ERC-8001 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-8001 (4)
0xb0238fc3 | cancelCoordination(bytes32,string) |
0x223330d5 | getAgentNonce(address) |
0x9a001b07 | getCoordinationStatus(bytes32) |
0x808b986f | getRequiredAcceptances(bytes32) |
▶️ Only in ERC-8107 (7)
0x77cdc00f | getIdentityGate(bytes32) |
0x4136a33c | getNonce(bytes32) |
0x9b9accfc | getTrust(bytes32,bytes32,bytes32) |
0x9b74b2c3 | pathExists(bytes32,bytes32,uint8) |
0x807c2b3a | removeIdentityGate(bytes32) |
0x73a8dd41 | revokeTrust(bytes32,bytes32,bytes32,bytes32) |
0xb90dc440 | validateParticipant(bytes32,bytes32,uint8,uint8) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-8001 · ERC-8107