ERC-7812 vs ERC-8354

ZK Identity Registry compared with Confidential Agent Policy Verdicts.

No shared functions

0 shared · 13 vs 10 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-8354 lists ERC-7812 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0xd1de592a`	`add(bytes32,bytes32)`
`0xdd458a1c`	`addStatement(bytes32,bytes32)`
`0xd601c10b`	`getIsolatedKey(address,bytes32)`
`0xcf22b577`	`getMaxHeight()`
`0x1b80bb3a`	`getProof(bytes32)`
`0x5ca1e165`	`getRoot()`
`0x3d90d66e`	`getRootTimestamp(bytes32)`
`0xde8fa431`	`getSize()`
`0x69843940`	`getValue(bytes32)`
`0x95bc2673`	`remove(bytes32)`
`0x237e83e0`	`removeStatement(bytes32)`
`0x13f57c3e`	`update(bytes32,bytes32)`
`0x807f3c4f`	`updateStatement(bytes32,bytes32)`

`0x8b5c79b1`	`consume((uint256,bytes32,bytes32,bytes32,address,uint64,bytes32,uint8,uint8),bytes,bytes)`
`0xd7525232`	`consume((uint256,bytes32,bytes32,bytes32,address,uint64,bytes32,uint8,uint8),bytes)`
`0xee9eee3e`	`currentRoot(bytes32)`
`0x00e35488`	`domain(bytes32)`
`0xd631b77a`	`isConsumed(bytes32,bytes32)`
`0xe90c46b3`	`isRootAcceptable(bytes32,bytes32)`
`0x8f0183bd`	`policyDomain()`
`0x01ffc9a7`	`supportsInterface(bytes4)`
`0x3c624403`	`verdictDigest((uint256,bytes32,bytes32,bytes32,address,uint64,bytes32,uint8,uint8))`
`0x608759aa`	`verify((uint256,bytes32,bytes32,bytes32,address,uint64,bytes32,uint8,uint8),bytes)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-7812 · ERC-8354