ERC-777 vs ERC-4337
Token Standard compared with Account Abstraction Using Alt Mempool.
Overlapping, neither contains the other
1 shared · 13 vs 9 functions · 11% of the smaller surface
🤝 Shared (1)
0x70a08231 | balanceOf(address) |
◀️ Only in ERC-777 (12)
0x959b8c3f | authorizeOperator(address) |
0xfe9d9303 | burn(uint256,bytes) |
0x06e48538 | defaultOperators() |
0x556f0dc7 | granularity() |
0xd95b6371 | isOperatorFor(address,address) |
0x06fdde03 | name() |
0xfc673c4f | operatorBurn(address,uint256,bytes,bytes) |
0x62ad1b83 | operatorSend(address,address,uint256,bytes,bytes) |
0xfad8b32a | revokeOperator(address) |
0x9bd9bbc6 | send(address,uint256,bytes) |
0x95d89b41 | symbol() |
0x18160ddd | totalSupply() |
▶️ Only in ERC-4337 (8)
0x0396cb60 | addStake(uint32) |
0xb760faf9 | depositTo(address) |
0xb0a398d1 | getCurrentUserOpHash() |
0x35567e1a | getNonce(address,uint192) |
0x7c627b21 | postOp(uint8,bytes,uint256,uint256) |
0xbb9fe6bf | unlockStake() |
0xc23a5cea | withdrawStake(address) |
0x205c2878 | withdrawTo(address,uint256) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-777 · ERC-4337