ERC-777 vs ERC-2612
Token Standard compared with Permit Extension for EIP-20 Signed Approvals.
No shared functions
0 shared · 13 vs 3 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-777 (13)
0x959b8c3f | authorizeOperator(address) |
0x70a08231 | balanceOf(address) |
0xfe9d9303 | burn(uint256,bytes) |
0x06e48538 | defaultOperators() |
0x556f0dc7 | granularity() |
0xd95b6371 | isOperatorFor(address,address) |
0x06fdde03 | name() |
0xfc673c4f | operatorBurn(address,uint256,bytes,bytes) |
0x62ad1b83 | operatorSend(address,address,uint256,bytes,bytes) |
0xfad8b32a | revokeOperator(address) |
0x9bd9bbc6 | send(address,uint256,bytes) |
0x95d89b41 | symbol() |
0x18160ddd | totalSupply() |
▶️ Only in ERC-2612 (3)
0x3644e515 | DOMAIN_SEPARATOR() |
0x7ecebe00 | nonces(address) |
0xd505accf | permit(address,address,uint256,uint256,uint8,bytes32,bytes32) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-777 · ERC-2612