ERC-7656 vs ERC-7897

Generalized Contract-Linked Services compared with Wallet-Linked Services for Smart Accounts.

No shared functions

0 shared · 3 vs 3 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-7897 lists ERC-7656 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0x2ae81fb1`	`compute(address,bytes32,uint256,bytes12,address,uint256)`
`0xb4cb3cbb`	`create(address,bytes32,uint256,bytes12,address,uint256)`
`0x7e110a1d`	`linkedData()`

`0xbd4a7b8c`	`deployService(address,bytes32,address)`
`0xf9adaaa5`	`serviceAddress(address,bytes32,uint256,address)`
`0x521eb273`	`wallet()`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-7656 · ERC-7897