ERC-7540 vs ERC-7887
Asynchronous ERC-4626 Tokenized Vaults compared with Cancelation for ERC-7540 Tokenized Vaults.
No shared functions
0 shared · 8 vs 8 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
ERC-7887 lists ERC-7540 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-7540 (8)
0x995ea21a | claimableDepositRequest(uint256,address) |
0xeaed1d07 | claimableRedeemRequest(uint256,address) |
0xb6363cf2 | isOperator(address,address) |
0x26c6f96c | pendingDepositRequest(uint256,address) |
0xf5a23d8d | pendingRedeemRequest(uint256,address) |
0x85b77f45 | requestDeposit(uint256,address,address) |
0x7d41c86e | requestRedeem(uint256,address,address) |
0x558a7297 | setOperator(address,bool) |
▶️ Only in ERC-7887 (8)
0xb9cf0634 | cancelDepositRequest(uint256,address) |
0x2b9d9c1f | cancelRedeemRequest(uint256,address) |
0xaabb5922 | claimableCancelDepositRequest(uint256,address) |
0xb04a5e05 | claimableCancelRedeemRequest(uint256,address) |
0x69d77a44 | claimCancelDepositRequest(uint256,address,address) |
0x00a06d19 | claimCancelRedeemRequest(uint256,address,address) |
0xf15b65b1 | pendingCancelDepositRequest(uint256,address) |
0x7c1b50c4 | pendingCancelRedeemRequest(uint256,address) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-7540 · ERC-7887