ERC-7540 vs ERC-7575

Asynchronous ERC-4626 Tokenized Vaults compared with Multi-Asset ERC-4626 Vaults.

No shared functions

0 shared · 8 vs 11 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-7540 lists ERC-7575 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0x995ea21a`	`claimableDepositRequest(uint256,address)`
`0xeaed1d07`	`claimableRedeemRequest(uint256,address)`
`0xb6363cf2`	`isOperator(address,address)`
`0x26c6f96c`	`pendingDepositRequest(uint256,address)`
`0xf5a23d8d`	`pendingRedeemRequest(uint256,address)`
`0x85b77f45`	`requestDeposit(uint256,address,address)`
`0x7d41c86e`	`requestRedeem(uint256,address,address)`
`0x558a7297`	`setOperator(address,bool)`

`0xdd62ed3e`	`allowance(address,address)`
`0x095ea7b3`	`approve(address,uint256)`
`0x70a08231`	`balanceOf(address)`
`0x313ce567`	`decimals()`
`0x06fdde03`	`name()`
`0x01ffc9a7`	`supportsInterface(bytes4)`
`0x95d89b41`	`symbol()`
`0x18160ddd`	`totalSupply()`
`0xa9059cbb`	`transfer(address,uint256)`
`0x23b872dd`	`transferFrom(address,address,uint256)`
`0x1b451d28`	`updateVault(address,address)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-7540 · ERC-7575