ERC-7291 vs ERC-7994

Purpose bound money compared with Purpose-Bound ERC-20 with Conditional Unlock.

No shared functions

0 shared · 17 vs 4 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-7994 lists ERC-7291 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0x8a94b05f`	`burn(address,uint256,uint256,bytes)`
`0x5473422e`	`burnBatch(address,uint256[],uint256[],bytes)`
`0x07e82e0f`	`initialise(address,uint256,address)`
`0xfe575a87`	`isBlacklisted(address)`
`0x1a2f7167`	`isMerchant(address)`
`0x99d548aa`	`load(uint256)`
`0x8da5cb5b`	`owner()`
`0x73e17e76`	`revokePBM(uint256)`
`0x2eb2c2d6`	`safeBatchTransferFrom(address,address,uint256[],uint256[],bytes)`
`0x5cfa9297`	`safeMint(address,uint256,uint256,bytes)`
`0xc39dfed8`	`safeMintBatch(address,uint256[],uint256[],bytes)`
`0xf242432a`	`safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256,uint256,bytes)`
`0x01ffc9a7`	`supportsInterface(bytes4)`
`0xf2fde38b`	`transferOwnership(address)`
`0x935a8b84`	`underlyingBalanceOf(address)`
`0xdc7956f0`	`unload(uint256)`
`0x0e89341c`	`uri(uint256)`

`0x91c0fd81`	`bindPurpose(address,uint256,(bytes32,bytes)[],uint256)`
`0xbd66528a`	`claim(bytes32)`
`0xd6d4a730`	`isConditionMet(address,bytes)`
`0x3dadc1e1`	`isUnlocked(bytes32)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-7291 · ERC-7994