ERC-721 vs ERC-8040
Non-Fungible Token Standard compared with ESG Tokenization Protocol.
No shared functions
0 shared · 10 vs 5 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
ERC-8040 lists ERC-721 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-721 (10)
0x095ea7b3 | approve(address,uint256) |
0x70a08231 | balanceOf(address) |
0x081812fc | getApproved(uint256) |
0xe985e9c5 | isApprovedForAll(address,address) |
0x6352211e | ownerOf(uint256) |
0xb88d4fde | safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256,bytes) |
0x42842e0e | safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256) |
0xa22cb465 | setApprovalForAll(address,bool) |
0x01ffc9a7 | supportsInterface(bytes4) |
0x23b872dd | transferFrom(address,address,uint256) |
▶️ Only in ERC-8040 (5)
0xb2b3fa5f | auditESGToken(uint256,bytes) |
0x55c68702 | esgURI(uint256) |
0xa574cea4 | getMetadata(uint256) |
0x06e58822 | mintESGToken((string,string,string,uint256,string,bytes,string,(bytes,string),string,string)) |
0x09eba508 | retireESGToken(uint256,string) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-721 · ERC-8040