ERC-721 vs ERC-7929
Non-Fungible Token Standard compared with PermaLink Asset Bound Token.
Overlapping, neither contains the other
2 shared · 10 vs 4 functions · 50% of the smaller surface
ERC-7929 lists ERC-721 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (2)
0x70a08231 | balanceOf(address) |
0x6352211e | ownerOf(uint256) |
◀️ Only in ERC-721 (8)
0x095ea7b3 | approve(address,uint256) |
0x081812fc | getApproved(uint256) |
0xe985e9c5 | isApprovedForAll(address,address) |
0xb88d4fde | safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256,bytes) |
0x42842e0e | safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256) |
0xa22cb465 | setApprovalForAll(address,bool) |
0x01ffc9a7 | supportsInterface(bytes4) |
0x23b872dd | transferFrom(address,address,uint256) |
▶️ Only in ERC-7929 (2)
0x00923f9e | tokenExists(uint256) |
0x18160ddd | totalSupply() |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-721 · ERC-7929