ERC-721 vs ERC-7432

Non-Fungible Token Standard compared with Non-Fungible Token Roles.

Overlapping, neither contains the other

1 shared · 10 vs 11 functions · 10% of the smaller surface

ERC-7432 lists ERC-721 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (1)

0x01ffc9a7 supportsInterface(bytes4)

`0x095ea7b3`	`approve(address,uint256)`
`0x70a08231`	`balanceOf(address)`
`0x081812fc`	`getApproved(uint256)`
`0xe985e9c5`	`isApprovedForAll(address,address)`
`0x6352211e`	`ownerOf(uint256)`
`0xb88d4fde`	`safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256,bytes)`
`0x42842e0e`	`safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256)`
`0xa22cb465`	`setApprovalForAll(address,bool)`
`0x23b872dd`	`transferFrom(address,address,uint256)`

`0x4b17eed0`	`grantRole((bytes32,address,uint256,address,uint64,bool,bytes))`
`0xd5ced376`	`isRoleApprovedForAll(address,address,address)`
`0xfe8dc863`	`isRoleRevocable(address,uint256,bytes32)`
`0x1f29d2dc`	`ownerOf(address,uint256)`
`0x3f916b48`	`recipientOf(address,uint256,bytes32)`
`0x0adc11c0`	`revokeRole(address,uint256,bytes32)`
`0x6d2feecf`	`roleData(address,uint256,bytes32)`
`0x65b0205b`	`roleExpirationDate(address,uint256,bytes32)`
`0xa34adf0a`	`setRoleApprovalForAll(address,address,bool)`
`0x31e9e9c0`	`unlockToken(address,uint256)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-721 · ERC-7432