ERC-721 vs ERC-6809

Non-Fungible Token Standard compared with Non-Fungible Key Bound Token.

No shared functions

0 shared · 10 vs 11 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-6809 lists ERC-721 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0x095ea7b3`	`approve(address,uint256)`
`0x70a08231`	`balanceOf(address)`
`0x081812fc`	`getApproved(uint256)`
`0xe985e9c5`	`isApprovedForAll(address,address)`
`0x6352211e`	`ownerOf(uint256)`
`0xb88d4fde`	`safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256,bytes)`
`0x42842e0e`	`safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256)`
`0xa22cb465`	`setApprovalForAll(address,bool)`
`0x01ffc9a7`	`supportsInterface(bytes4)`
`0x23b872dd`	`transferFrom(address,address,uint256)`

`0xe54e193c`	`addBindings(address,address)`
`0x9abb7c91`	`allowApproval(uint256,uint256)`
`0x7c9dc1a7`	`allowTransfer(uint256,uint256,address,bool)`
`0x20fb3be3`	`getApprovalConditions(address)`
`0x0e020296`	`getBindings(address)`
`0x3e794dc0`	`getNumberOfTransfersAllowed(address,address)`
`0x2a440d98`	`getTransferableFunds(address)`
`0xa4d54b1a`	`isSecureToken(uint256)`
`0xecbb669f`	`isSecureWallet(address)`
`0x7d1a5bd1`	`resetBindings()`
`0x646ec3d8`	`safeFallback()`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-721 · ERC-6809