ERC-721 vs ERC-5334

Non-Fungible Token Standard compared with EIP-721 User And Expires And Level Extension.

No shared functions

0 shared · 10 vs 4 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-5334 lists ERC-721 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0x095ea7b3`	`approve(address,uint256)`
`0x70a08231`	`balanceOf(address)`
`0x081812fc`	`getApproved(uint256)`
`0xe985e9c5`	`isApprovedForAll(address,address)`
`0x6352211e`	`ownerOf(uint256)`
`0xb88d4fde`	`safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256,bytes)`
`0x42842e0e`	`safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256)`
`0xa22cb465`	`setApprovalForAll(address,bool)`
`0x01ffc9a7`	`supportsInterface(bytes4)`
`0x23b872dd`	`transferFrom(address,address,uint256)`

`0x3632546a`	`setUser(uint256,address,uint64,uint8)`
`0x8fc88c48`	`userExpires(uint256)`
`0xab50243f`	`userLevel(uint256)`
`0xc2f1f14a`	`userOf(uint256)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-721 · ERC-5334