ERC-721 vs ERC-4910

Non-Fungible Token Standard compared with Royalty Bearing NFTs.

Overlapping, neither contains the other

1 shared · 10 vs 9 functions · 11% of the smaller surface

ERC-4910 lists ERC-721 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (1)

0xb88d4fde safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256,bytes)

`0x095ea7b3`	`approve(address,uint256)`
`0x70a08231`	`balanceOf(address)`
`0x081812fc`	`getApproved(uint256)`
`0xe985e9c5`	`isApprovedForAll(address,address)`
`0x6352211e`	`ownerOf(uint256)`
`0x42842e0e`	`safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256)`
`0xa22cb465`	`setApprovalForAll(address,bool)`
`0x01ffc9a7`	`supportsInterface(bytes4)`
`0x23b872dd`	`transferFrom(address,address,uint256)`

`0xbad76677`	`_royaltyPayOut(uint256,address,address,uint256)`
`0x004699d0`	`deleteRoyaltyAccount(uint256)`
`0xbc50ef86`	`distributePayment(uint256,uint265)`
`0xfc09c55c`	`getRoyaltyAccount(uint256)`
`0xc9488cd3`	`listNFT(uint256[],uint256,address)`
`0xb2230b7e`	`removeNFTListing(uint256)`
`0xb376f046`	`reversePayment(uint256,string)`
`0x9e51fd42`	`royaltyPayOut(uint256,address,address,uint256)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-721 · ERC-4910