ERC-721 vs ERC-4337
Non-Fungible Token Standard compared with Account Abstraction Using Alt Mempool.
Overlapping, neither contains the other
1 shared · 10 vs 9 functions · 11% of the smaller surface
🤝 Shared (1)
0x70a08231 | balanceOf(address) |
◀️ Only in ERC-721 (9)
0x095ea7b3 | approve(address,uint256) |
0x081812fc | getApproved(uint256) |
0xe985e9c5 | isApprovedForAll(address,address) |
0x6352211e | ownerOf(uint256) |
0xb88d4fde | safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256,bytes) |
0x42842e0e | safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256) |
0xa22cb465 | setApprovalForAll(address,bool) |
0x01ffc9a7 | supportsInterface(bytes4) |
0x23b872dd | transferFrom(address,address,uint256) |
▶️ Only in ERC-4337 (8)
0x0396cb60 | addStake(uint32) |
0xb760faf9 | depositTo(address) |
0xb0a398d1 | getCurrentUserOpHash() |
0x35567e1a | getNonce(address,uint192) |
0x7c627b21 | postOp(uint8,bytes,uint256,uint256) |
0xbb9fe6bf | unlockStake() |
0xc23a5cea | withdrawStake(address) |
0x205c2878 | withdrawTo(address,uint256) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-721 · ERC-4337