ERC-721 vs ERC-2612
Non-Fungible Token Standard compared with Permit Extension for EIP-20 Signed Approvals.
No shared functions
0 shared · 10 vs 3 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-721 (10)
0x095ea7b3 | approve(address,uint256) |
0x70a08231 | balanceOf(address) |
0x081812fc | getApproved(uint256) |
0xe985e9c5 | isApprovedForAll(address,address) |
0x6352211e | ownerOf(uint256) |
0xb88d4fde | safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256,bytes) |
0x42842e0e | safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256) |
0xa22cb465 | setApprovalForAll(address,bool) |
0x01ffc9a7 | supportsInterface(bytes4) |
0x23b872dd | transferFrom(address,address,uint256) |
▶️ Only in ERC-2612 (3)
0x3644e515 | DOMAIN_SEPARATOR() |
0x7ecebe00 | nonces(address) |
0xd505accf | permit(address,address,uint256,uint256,uint8,bytes32,bytes32) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-721 · ERC-2612