ERC-721 vs ERC-1046

Non-Fungible Token Standard compared with tokenURI Interoperability.

Overlapping, neither contains the other

6 shared · 10 vs 18 functions · 60% of the smaller surface

ERC-1046 lists ERC-721 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

Shared (6)

`0x095ea7b3`	`approve(address,uint256)`
`0x70a08231`	`balanceOf(address)`
`0xe985e9c5`	`isApprovedForAll(address,address)`
`0xa22cb465`	`setApprovalForAll(address,bool)`
`0x01ffc9a7`	`supportsInterface(bytes4)`
`0x23b872dd`	`transferFrom(address,address,uint256)`

`0x081812fc`	`getApproved(uint256)`
`0x6352211e`	`ownerOf(uint256)`
`0xb88d4fde`	`safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256,bytes)`
`0x42842e0e`	`safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256)`

`0xdd62ed3e`	`allowance(address,address)`
`0x00fdd58e`	`balanceOf(address,uint256)`
`0x4e1273f4`	`balanceOfBatch(address[],uint256[])`
`0x313ce567`	`decimals()`
`0x06fdde03`	`name()`
`0x2eb2c2d6`	`safeBatchTransferFrom(address,address,uint256[],uint256[],bytes)`
`0xf242432a`	`safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256,uint256,bytes)`
`0x95d89b41`	`symbol()`
`0x3c130d90`	`tokenURI()`
`0xc87b56dd`	`tokenURI(uint256)`
`0x18160ddd`	`totalSupply()`
`0xa9059cbb`	`transfer(address,uint256)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-721 · ERC-1046