ERC-6551 vs ERC-7897

Non-fungible Token Bound Accounts compared with Wallet-Linked Services for Smart Accounts.

No shared functions

0 shared · 6 vs 3 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-7897 lists ERC-6551 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0x246a0021`	`account(address,bytes32,uint256,address,uint256)`
`0x8a54c52f`	`createAccount(address,bytes32,uint256,address,uint256)`
`0x51945447`	`execute(address,uint256,bytes,uint8)`
`0x523e3260`	`isValidSigner(address,bytes)`
`0xc19d93fb`	`state()`
`0xfc0c546a`	`token()`

`0xbd4a7b8c`	`deployService(address,bytes32,address)`
`0xf9adaaa5`	`serviceAddress(address,bytes32,uint256,address)`
`0x521eb273`	`wallet()`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-6551 · ERC-7897