ERC-6366 vs ERC-6617
Permission Token compared with Bit Based Permission.
No shared functions
0 shared · 6 vs 3 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
ERC-6366 lists ERC-6617 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-6366 (6)
0x095ea7b3 | approve(address,uint256) |
0xf6bcbd31 | delegated(address,address) |
0x8b01813d | hasPermission(address,address,uint256) |
0xa3aced06 | permissionOf(address) |
0xd83186fe | permissionRequire(uint256,uint256) |
0xa9059cbb | transfer(address,uint256) |
▶️ Only in ERC-6617 (3)
0x6fe34920 | grantPermission(address,uint256) |
0x8d944fd9 | hasPermission(address,uint256) |
0xfa4d8566 | revokePermission(address,uint256) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-6366 · ERC-6617