ERC-5750 vs ERC-6224

General Extensibility for Method Behaviors compared with Contracts Dependencies Registry.

No shared functions

0 shared · 5 vs 14 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-6224 lists ERC-5750 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0xea8b4cda`	`firstNonRelatedMethod(uint256)`
`0xa48605de`	`methodName1(uint256,address,bytes)`
`0x9cb34bb8`	`methodName2(uint256,address,bytes)`
`0x6e3c08a6`	`methodName2(uint256,address)`
`0xb483ad1a`	`secondNonRelatedMethod(uint256)`

`0xbf5b6016`	`addContract(string,address)`
`0xe0e084f8`	`addProxyContract(string,address)`
`0x423c072b`	`addProxyContractAndCall(string,address,bytes)`
`0x35817773`	`getContract(string)`
`0x3e3b5b19`	`getInjector()`
`0x8c223601`	`hasContract(string)`
`0x1adad8cf`	`injectDependencies(string)`
`0xbe96dc3e`	`injectDependenciesWithData(string,bytes)`
`0x51dad82c`	`justAddProxyContract(string,address)`
`0x97623b58`	`removeContract(string)`
`0x69130451`	`setDependencies(address,bytes)`
`0x8cb941cc`	`setInjector(address)`
`0x1271bd53`	`upgradeContract(string,address)`
`0x6bbe8694`	`upgradeContractAndCall(string,address,bytes)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-5750 · ERC-6224