ERC-4626 vs ERC-7540

Tokenized Vaults compared with Asynchronous ERC-4626 Tokenized Vaults.

No shared functions

0 shared · 16 vs 8 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-7540 lists ERC-4626 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0x38d52e0f`	`asset()`
`0x07a2d13a`	`convertToAssets(uint256)`
`0xc6e6f592`	`convertToShares(uint256)`
`0x6e553f65`	`deposit(uint256,address)`
`0x402d267d`	`maxDeposit(address)`
`0xc63d75b6`	`maxMint(address)`
`0xd905777e`	`maxRedeem(address)`
`0xce96cb77`	`maxWithdraw(address)`
`0x94bf804d`	`mint(uint256,address)`
`0xef8b30f7`	`previewDeposit(uint256)`
`0xb3d7f6b9`	`previewMint(uint256)`
`0x4cdad506`	`previewRedeem(uint256)`
`0x0a28a477`	`previewWithdraw(uint256)`
`0xba087652`	`redeem(uint256,address,address)`
`0x01e1d114`	`totalAssets()`
`0xb460af94`	`withdraw(uint256,address,address)`

`0x995ea21a`	`claimableDepositRequest(uint256,address)`
`0xeaed1d07`	`claimableRedeemRequest(uint256,address)`
`0xb6363cf2`	`isOperator(address,address)`
`0x26c6f96c`	`pendingDepositRequest(uint256,address)`
`0xf5a23d8d`	`pendingRedeemRequest(uint256,address)`
`0x85b77f45`	`requestDeposit(uint256,address,address)`
`0x7d41c86e`	`requestRedeem(uint256,address,address)`
`0x558a7297`	`setOperator(address,bool)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-4626 · ERC-7540