ERC-4400 vs ERC-5501
EIP-721 Consumable Extension compared with Rental & Delegation NFT - EIP-721 Extension.
Overlapping, neither contains the other
10 shared · 12 vs 14 functions · 83% of the smaller surface
ERC-5501 lists ERC-4400 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (10)
0x095ea7b3 | approve(address,uint256) |
0x70a08231 | balanceOf(address) |
0x081812fc | getApproved(uint256) |
0xe985e9c5 | isApprovedForAll(address,address) |
0x6352211e | ownerOf(uint256) |
0xb88d4fde | safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256,bytes) |
0x42842e0e | safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256) |
0xa22cb465 | setApprovalForAll(address,bool) |
0x01ffc9a7 | supportsInterface(bytes4) |
0x23b872dd | transferFrom(address,address,uint256) |
◀️ Only in ERC-4400 (2)
0x70b5aecb | changeConsumer(address,uint256) |
0xe5892331 | consumerOf(uint256) |
▶️ Only in ERC-5501 (4)
0xcbd00851 | setUser(uint256,address,uint64,bool) |
0x8fc88c48 | userExpires(uint256) |
0x7ee19964 | userIsBorrowed(uint256) |
0xc2f1f14a | userOf(uint256) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-4400 · ERC-5501