ERC-4337 vs ERC-7579
Account Abstraction Using Alt Mempool compared with Minimal Modular Smart Accounts.
No shared functions
0 shared · 9 vs 12 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
ERC-7579 lists ERC-4337 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-4337 (9)
0x0396cb60 | addStake(uint32) |
0x70a08231 | balanceOf(address) |
0xb760faf9 | depositTo(address) |
0xb0a398d1 | getCurrentUserOpHash() |
0x35567e1a | getNonce(address,uint192) |
0x7c627b21 | postOp(uint8,bytes,uint256,uint256) |
0xbb9fe6bf | unlockStake() |
0xc23a5cea | withdrawStake(address) |
0x205c2878 | withdrawTo(address,uint256) |
▶️ Only in ERC-7579 (12)
0x9cfd7cff | accountId() |
0xe9ae5c53 | execute(bytes32,bytes) |
0xd691c964 | executeFromExecutor(bytes32,bytes) |
0x9517e29f | installModule(uint256,address,bytes) |
0x112d3a7d | isModuleInstalled(uint256,address,bytes) |
0xecd05961 | isModuleType(uint256) |
0xf551e2ee | isValidSignatureWithSender(address,bytes32,bytes) |
0x6d61fe70 | onInstall(bytes) |
0x8a91b0e3 | onUninstall(bytes) |
0xd03c7914 | supportsExecutionMode(bytes32) |
0xf2dc691d | supportsModule(uint256) |
0xa71763a8 | uninstallModule(uint256,address,bytes) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-4337 · ERC-7579