ERC-4337 vs ERC-4626
Account Abstraction Using Alt Mempool compared with Tokenized Vaults.
No shared functions
0 shared · 9 vs 16 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-4337 (9)
0x0396cb60 | addStake(uint32) |
0x70a08231 | balanceOf(address) |
0xb760faf9 | depositTo(address) |
0xb0a398d1 | getCurrentUserOpHash() |
0x35567e1a | getNonce(address,uint192) |
0x7c627b21 | postOp(uint8,bytes,uint256,uint256) |
0xbb9fe6bf | unlockStake() |
0xc23a5cea | withdrawStake(address) |
0x205c2878 | withdrawTo(address,uint256) |
▶️ Only in ERC-4626 (16)
0x38d52e0f | asset() |
0x07a2d13a | convertToAssets(uint256) |
0xc6e6f592 | convertToShares(uint256) |
0x6e553f65 | deposit(uint256,address) |
0x402d267d | maxDeposit(address) |
0xc63d75b6 | maxMint(address) |
0xd905777e | maxRedeem(address) |
0xce96cb77 | maxWithdraw(address) |
0x94bf804d | mint(uint256,address) |
0xef8b30f7 | previewDeposit(uint256) |
0xb3d7f6b9 | previewMint(uint256) |
0x4cdad506 | previewRedeem(uint256) |
0x0a28a477 | previewWithdraw(uint256) |
0xba087652 | redeem(uint256,address,address) |
0x01e1d114 | totalAssets() |
0xb460af94 | withdraw(uint256,address,address) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-4337 · ERC-4626