ERC-2981 vs ERC-5635

NFT Royalty Standard compared with NFT Licensing Agreements.

Overlapping, neither contains the other

1 shared · 2 vs 10 functions · 50% of the smaller surface

ERC-5635 lists ERC-2981 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (1)

0x01ffc9a7 supportsInterface(bytes4)

0x2a55205a royaltyInfo(uint256,uint256)

`0xe1f21c67`	`approve(address,address,uint256)`
`0xdc68afd5`	`authorizedBy(uint256,uint256)`
`0x098f2366`	`getApproved(address,uint256)`
`0xf49f40db`	`isApprovedForAll(address,address,address)`
`0x9b488346`	`isLicensed(address,uint256,address,uint256)`
`0x6f54368f`	`licensingInfo(address,uint256,address,uint256)`
`0x61c1e9e3`	`numberOfCredentials(uint256)`
`0xad3d86fd`	`royaltyRate(address,uint256,address,uint256)`
`0x367605ca`	`setApprovalForAll(address,address,bool)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-2981 · ERC-5635