ERC-2771 vs ERC-7575
Secure Protocol for Native Meta Transactions compared with Multi-Asset ERC-4626 Vaults.
No shared functions
0 shared · 2 vs 11 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
ERC-7575 lists ERC-2771 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-2771 (2)
0x572b6c05 | isTrustedForwarder(address) |
0xd38ea5bf | purchaseItem(uint256) |
▶️ Only in ERC-7575 (11)
0xdd62ed3e | allowance(address,address) |
0x095ea7b3 | approve(address,uint256) |
0x70a08231 | balanceOf(address) |
0x313ce567 | decimals() |
0x06fdde03 | name() |
0x01ffc9a7 | supportsInterface(bytes4) |
0x95d89b41 | symbol() |
0x18160ddd | totalSupply() |
0xa9059cbb | transfer(address,uint256) |
0x23b872dd | transferFrom(address,address,uint256) |
0x1b451d28 | updateVault(address,address) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-2771 · ERC-7575