ERC-2771 vs ERC-6315
Secure Protocol for Native Meta Transactions compared with ERC-2771 Namespaced Account Abstraction.
No shared functions
0 shared · 2 vs 1 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
ERC-6315 lists ERC-2771 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-2771 (2)
0x572b6c05 | isTrustedForwarder(address) |
0xd38ea5bf | purchaseItem(uint256) |
▶️ Only in ERC-6315 (1)
0xc23f1dd4 | isNamespacedTransaction() |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-2771 · ERC-6315