ERC-2612 vs ERC-8187

Permit Extension for EIP-20 Signed Approvals compared with Token Puller.

No shared functions

0 shared · 3 vs 7 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-8187 lists ERC-2612 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0x3644e515`	`DOMAIN_SEPARATOR()`
`0x7ecebe00`	`nonces(address)`
`0xd505accf`	`permit(address,address,uint256,uint256,uint8,bytes32,bytes32)`

`0xd31cc1b6`	`approvePull(address,address,uint256)`
`0x6165a581`	`maxPullable(address,address,uint256)`
`0x35e0fb4f`	`permitPull(address,address,address,uint256,uint256,bytes)`
`0xcb29c658`	`pullAllowance(address,address,address)`
`0xef3ee967`	`pullFrom(address,address,address,uint256)`
`0x11c794dc`	`pullFromWithPermit(address,address,address,uint256,uint256,bytes)`
`0xdf987337`	`transferPullAllowance(address,address,address,uint256)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-2612 · ERC-8187