ERC-2612 vs ERC-7962

Permit Extension for EIP-20 Signed Approvals compared with Key Hash Based Tokens.

No shared functions

0 shared · 3 vs 9 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-7962 lists ERC-2612 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0x3644e515`	`DOMAIN_SEPARATOR()`
`0x7ecebe00`	`nonces(address)`
`0xd505accf`	`permit(address,address,uint256,uint256,uint8,bytes32,bytes32)`

`0x6c7f1542`	`balanceOf(bytes32)`
`0x313ce567`	`decimals()`
`0x06fdde03`	`name()`
`0x6352211e`	`ownerOf(uint256)`
`0x95d89b41`	`symbol()`
`0xc87b56dd`	`tokenURI(uint256)`
`0x18160ddd`	`totalSupply()`
`0x222a3b2b`	`transfer(bytes32,bytes32,uint256,bytes,bytes,uint256,bytes32)`
`0xd2b36b7f`	`transfer(uint256,bytes32,bytes,bytes,uint256)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-2612 · ERC-7962