ERC-2612 vs ERC-7597
Permit Extension for EIP-20 Signed Approvals compared with Signature Validation Extension for Permit.
Overlapping, neither contains the other
2 shared · 3 vs 3 functions · 67% of the smaller surface
ERC-7597 lists ERC-2612 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (2)
0x3644e515 | DOMAIN_SEPARATOR() |
0x7ecebe00 | nonces(address) |
◀️ Only in ERC-2612 (1)
0xd505accf | permit(address,address,uint256,uint256,uint8,bytes32,bytes32) |
▶️ Only in ERC-7597 (1)
0x9fd5a6cf | permit(address,address,uint256,uint256,bytes) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-2612 · ERC-7597