ERC-2612 vs ERC-5095
Permit Extension for EIP-20 Signed Approvals compared with Principal Token.
No shared functions
0 shared · 3 vs 10 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
ERC-5095 lists ERC-2612 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-2612 (3)
0x3644e515 | DOMAIN_SEPARATOR() |
0x7ecebe00 | nonces(address) |
0xd505accf | permit(address,address,uint256,uint256,uint8,bytes32,bytes32) |
▶️ Only in ERC-5095 (10)
0x25a8d87d | convertToPrincipal(uint256) |
0x1dc7f521 | convertToUnderlying(uint256) |
0x204f83f9 | maturity() |
0xd905777e | maxRedeem(address) |
0xce96cb77 | maxWithdraw(address) |
0x4cdad506 | previewRedeem(uint256) |
0x0a28a477 | previewWithdraw(uint256) |
0xba087652 | redeem(uint256,address,address) |
0x6f307dc3 | underlying() |
0xb460af94 | withdraw(uint256,address,address) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-2612 · ERC-5095