ERC-20 vs ERC-8040

Token Standard compared with ESG Tokenization Protocol.

No shared functions

0 shared · 9 vs 5 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-8040 lists ERC-20 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0xdd62ed3e`	`allowance(address,address)`
`0x095ea7b3`	`approve(address,uint256)`
`0x70a08231`	`balanceOf(address)`
`0x313ce567`	`decimals()`
`0x06fdde03`	`name()`
`0x95d89b41`	`symbol()`
`0x18160ddd`	`totalSupply()`
`0xa9059cbb`	`transfer(address,uint256)`
`0x23b872dd`	`transferFrom(address,address,uint256)`

`0xb2b3fa5f`	`auditESGToken(uint256,bytes)`
`0x55c68702`	`esgURI(uint256)`
`0xa574cea4`	`getMetadata(uint256)`
`0x06e58822`	`mintESGToken((string,string,string,uint256,string,bytes,string,(bytes,string),string,string))`
`0x09eba508`	`retireESGToken(uint256,string)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-20 · ERC-8040