ERC-20 vs ERC-7994

Token Standard compared with Purpose-Bound ERC-20 with Conditional Unlock.

No shared functions

0 shared · 9 vs 4 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-7994 lists ERC-20 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0xdd62ed3e`	`allowance(address,address)`
`0x095ea7b3`	`approve(address,uint256)`
`0x70a08231`	`balanceOf(address)`
`0x313ce567`	`decimals()`
`0x06fdde03`	`name()`
`0x95d89b41`	`symbol()`
`0x18160ddd`	`totalSupply()`
`0xa9059cbb`	`transfer(address,uint256)`
`0x23b872dd`	`transferFrom(address,address,uint256)`

`0x91c0fd81`	`bindPurpose(address,uint256,(bytes32,bytes)[],uint256)`
`0xbd66528a`	`claim(bytes32)`
`0xd6d4a730`	`isConditionMet(address,bytes)`
`0x3dadc1e1`	`isUnlocked(bytes32)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-20 · ERC-7994