ERC-20 vs ERC-7962
Token Standard compared with Key Hash Based Tokens.
Overlapping, neither contains the other
4 shared · 9 vs 9 functions · 44% of the smaller surface
ERC-7962 lists ERC-20 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (4)
0x313ce567 | decimals() |
0x06fdde03 | name() |
0x95d89b41 | symbol() |
0x18160ddd | totalSupply() |
◀️ Only in ERC-20 (5)
0xdd62ed3e | allowance(address,address) |
0x095ea7b3 | approve(address,uint256) |
0x70a08231 | balanceOf(address) |
0xa9059cbb | transfer(address,uint256) |
0x23b872dd | transferFrom(address,address,uint256) |
▶️ Only in ERC-7962 (5)
0x6c7f1542 | balanceOf(bytes32) |
0x6352211e | ownerOf(uint256) |
0xc87b56dd | tokenURI(uint256) |
0x222a3b2b | transfer(bytes32,bytes32,uint256,bytes,bytes,uint256,bytes32) |
0xd2b36b7f | transfer(uint256,bytes32,bytes,bytes,uint256) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-20 · ERC-7962