ERC-20 vs ERC-7945
Token Standard compared with Confidential Transactions Supported Token.
No shared functions
0 shared · 9 vs 5 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
ERC-7945 lists ERC-20 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-20 (9)
0xdd62ed3e | allowance(address,address) |
0x095ea7b3 | approve(address,uint256) |
0x70a08231 | balanceOf(address) |
0x313ce567 | decimals() |
0x06fdde03 | name() |
0x95d89b41 | symbol() |
0x18160ddd | totalSupply() |
0xa9059cbb | transfer(address,uint256) |
0x23b872dd | transferFrom(address,address,uint256) |
▶️ Only in ERC-7945 (5)
0x3596ebf2 | confidentialAllowance(address,address) |
0xd9c2467b | confidentialApprove(address,bytes,bytes) |
0x344ff101 | confidentialBalanceOf(address) |
0x7e8b882c | confidentialTransfer(address,bytes,bytes) |
0x464ef115 | confidentialTransferFrom(address,address,bytes,bytes) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-20 · ERC-7945