ERC-20 vs ERC-7656

Token Standard compared with Generalized Contract-Linked Services.

No shared functions

0 shared · 9 vs 3 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-7656 lists ERC-20 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0xdd62ed3e`	`allowance(address,address)`
`0x095ea7b3`	`approve(address,uint256)`
`0x70a08231`	`balanceOf(address)`
`0x313ce567`	`decimals()`
`0x06fdde03`	`name()`
`0x95d89b41`	`symbol()`
`0x18160ddd`	`totalSupply()`
`0xa9059cbb`	`transfer(address,uint256)`
`0x23b872dd`	`transferFrom(address,address,uint256)`

`0x2ae81fb1`	`compute(address,bytes32,uint256,bytes12,address,uint256)`
`0xb4cb3cbb`	`create(address,bytes32,uint256,bytes12,address,uint256)`
`0x7e110a1d`	`linkedData()`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-20 · ERC-7656