ERC-20 vs ERC-7651
Token Standard compared with Fractionally Represented Non-Fungible Token.
Overlapping, neither contains the other
7 shared · 9 vs 13 functions · 78% of the smaller surface
ERC-7651 lists ERC-20 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (7)
0xdd62ed3e | allowance(address,address) |
0x095ea7b3 | approve(address,uint256) |
0x70a08231 | balanceOf(address) |
0x313ce567 | decimals() |
0x18160ddd | totalSupply() |
0xa9059cbb | transfer(address,uint256) |
0x23b872dd | transferFrom(address,address,uint256) |
◀️ Only in ERC-20 (2)
0x06fdde03 | name() |
0x95d89b41 | symbol() |
▶️ Only in ERC-7651 (6)
0xe985e9c5 | isApprovedForAll(address,address) |
0x6352211e | ownerOf(uint256) |
0xb88d4fde | safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256,bytes) |
0x42842e0e | safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256) |
0xa22cb465 | setApprovalForAll(address,bool) |
0x01ffc9a7 | supportsInterface(bytes4) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-20 · ERC-7651