ERC-20 vs ERC-7425

Token Standard compared with Tokenized Reserve.

No shared functions

0 shared · 9 vs 28 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-7425 lists ERC-20 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0xdd62ed3e`	`allowance(address,address)`
`0x095ea7b3`	`approve(address,uint256)`
`0x70a08231`	`balanceOf(address)`
`0x313ce567`	`decimals()`
`0x06fdde03`	`name()`
`0x95d89b41`	`symbol()`
`0x18160ddd`	`totalSupply()`
`0xa9059cbb`	`transfer(address,uint256)`
`0x23b872dd`	`transferFrom(address,address,uint256)`

`0x38d52e0f`	`asset()`
`0x8421bddf`	`closeProposal(address,uint256,uint256,bool)`
`0x07a2d13a`	`convertToAssets(uint256)`
`0xc6e6f592`	`convertToShares(uint256)`
`0x6e553f65`	`deposit(uint256,address)`
`0xde560e35`	`depositReserve(address,address,uint256)`
`0x402d267d`	`maxDeposit(address)`
`0xc63d75b6`	`maxMint(address)`
`0xd905777e`	`maxRedeem(address)`
`0xce96cb77`	`maxWithdraw(address)`
`0x94bf804d`	`mint(uint256,address)`
`0x52d40c6f`	`openProposal(address,uint256,address)`
`0x98d6d2df`	`ownerDeposit(uint256,uint256)`
`0xad2b7522`	`ownerTime(uint256)`
`0xfb2f51af`	`ownerWithdrawals(uint256)`
`0xef8b30f7`	`previewDeposit(uint256)`
`0xb3d7f6b9`	`previewMint(uint256)`
`0x4cdad506`	`previewRedeem(uint256)`
`0x0a28a477`	`previewWithdraw(uint256)`
`0x55f86df8`	`proposalDeposit(uint256,address,uint256)`
`0xc49724ec`	`proposalWithdraw(uint256,address,address,uint256)`
`0xba087652`	`redeem(uint256,address,address)`
`0xe1fe7d23`	`tokenDeposit(uint256)`
`0xa92457a1`	`tokenWithdrawal(uint256)`
`0x01e1d114`	`totalAssets()`
`0xb52d7343`	`userDeposit(address,uint256)`
`0x46d1e91b`	`userWithdrawals(address,uint256)`
`0xb460af94`	`withdraw(uint256,address,address)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-20 · ERC-7425