ERC-20 vs ERC-7390

Token Standard compared with Vanilla Options for ERC-20 Tokens.

No shared functions

0 shared · 9 vs 8 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-7390 lists ERC-20 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0xdd62ed3e`	`allowance(address,address)`
`0x095ea7b3`	`approve(address,uint256)`
`0x70a08231`	`balanceOf(address)`
`0x313ce567`	`decimals()`
`0x06fdde03`	`name()`
`0x95d89b41`	`symbol()`
`0x18160ddd`	`totalSupply()`
`0xa9059cbb`	`transfer(address,uint256)`
`0x23b872dd`	`transferFrom(address,address,uint256)`

`0xd6febde8`	`buy(uint256,uint256)`
`0x57d682c4`	`cancel(uint256,address)`
`0x4b849905`	`create((uint8,address,uint256,address,uint256,address,uint256,uint256,uint256,address[]))`
`0xa86265bb`	`exercise(uint256,uint256)`
`0x248b761e`	`issuance(uint256)`
`0xbe74c737`	`retrieveExpiredTokens(uint256,address)`
`0x86d1743f`	`updateAllowed(uint256,address[])`
`0xdb191d5d`	`updatePremium(uint256,uint256)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-20 · ERC-7390