ERC-20 vs ERC-6932
Token Standard compared with Subscription-Based Token.
No shared functions
0 shared · 9 vs 6 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
ERC-6932 lists ERC-20 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-20 (9)
0xdd62ed3e | allowance(address,address) |
0x095ea7b3 | approve(address,uint256) |
0x70a08231 | balanceOf(address) |
0x313ce567 | decimals() |
0x06fdde03 | name() |
0x95d89b41 | symbol() |
0x18160ddd | totalSupply() |
0xa9059cbb | transfer(address,uint256) |
0x23b872dd | transferFrom(address,address,uint256) |
▶️ Only in ERC-6932 (6)
0x8f449a05 | subscribe() |
0x59221a68 | subscribers(uint256) |
0x0aa0a175 | subscriptionFee() |
0xabb40373 | subscriptionFrequency() |
0xb0425b16 | subscriptionInfo() |
0xfcae4484 | unsubscribe() |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-20 · ERC-6932