ERC-20 vs ERC-6808

Token Standard compared with Fungible Key Bound Token.

No shared functions

0 shared · 9 vs 10 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-6808 lists ERC-20 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0xdd62ed3e`	`allowance(address,address)`
`0x095ea7b3`	`approve(address,uint256)`
`0x70a08231`	`balanceOf(address)`
`0x313ce567`	`decimals()`
`0x06fdde03`	`name()`
`0x95d89b41`	`symbol()`
`0x18160ddd`	`totalSupply()`
`0xa9059cbb`	`transfer(address,uint256)`
`0x23b872dd`	`transferFrom(address,address,uint256)`

`0xe54e193c`	`addBindings(address,address)`
`0x9abb7c91`	`allowApproval(uint256,uint256)`
`0x7c9dc1a7`	`allowTransfer(uint256,uint256,address,bool)`
`0x20fb3be3`	`getApprovalConditions(address)`
`0x0e020296`	`getBindings(address)`
`0x3e794dc0`	`getNumberOfTransfersAllowed(address,address)`
`0x2a440d98`	`getTransferableFunds(address)`
`0xecbb669f`	`isSecureWallet(address)`
`0x7d1a5bd1`	`resetBindings()`
`0x646ec3d8`	`safeFallback()`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-20 · ERC-6808