ERC-20 vs ERC-6353

Token Standard compared with Charity token.

No shared functions

0 shared · 9 vs 11 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-6353 lists ERC-20 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0xdd62ed3e`	`allowance(address,address)`
`0x095ea7b3`	`approve(address,uint256)`
`0x70a08231`	`balanceOf(address)`
`0x313ce567`	`decimals()`
`0x06fdde03`	`name()`
`0x95d89b41`	`symbol()`
`0x18160ddd`	`totalSupply()`
`0xa9059cbb`	`transfer(address,uint256)`
`0x23b872dd`	`transferFrom(address,address,uint256)`

`0xe43252d7`	`addToWhitelist(address)`
`0x991ec6f7`	`charityInfo(address)`
`0x7c09829d`	`deleteDefaultAddress()`
`0xecfb5d17`	`deleteFromWhitelist(address)`
`0xb56eebfb`	`getAllWhitelistedAddresses()`
`0x679aefce`	`getRate()`
`0x915dc774`	`setSpecificDefaultAddress(address)`
`0x84f39e1e`	`setSpecificDefaultAddressAndRate(address,uint256)`
`0x4c677803`	`setSpecificRate(address,uint256)`
`0xca08ec7d`	`specificDefaultAddress()`
`0x01ffc9a7`	`supportsInterface(bytes4)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-20 · ERC-6353