ERC-20 vs ERC-5553

Token Standard compared with Representing IP and its Royalty Structure.

No shared functions

0 shared · 9 vs 5 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-5553 lists ERC-20 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0xdd62ed3e`	`allowance(address,address)`
`0x095ea7b3`	`approve(address,uint256)`
`0x70a08231`	`balanceOf(address)`
`0x313ce567`	`decimals()`
`0x06fdde03`	`name()`
`0x95d89b41`	`symbol()`
`0x18160ddd`	`totalSupply()`
`0xa9059cbb`	`transfer(address,uint256)`
`0x23b872dd`	`transferFrom(address,address,uint256)`

`0x5655c6d9`	`changeMetadataURI(string,string)`
`0x56397c35`	`ledger()`
`0x03ee438c`	`metadataURI()`
`0x04f7b05c`	`royaltyPortionTokens()`
`0x01ffc9a7`	`supportsInterface(bytes4)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-20 · ERC-5553