ERC-20 vs ERC-5169
Token Standard compared with Client Script URI for Token Contracts.
No shared functions
0 shared · 9 vs 2 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
ERC-5169 lists ERC-20 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-20 (9)
0xdd62ed3e | allowance(address,address) |
0x095ea7b3 | approve(address,uint256) |
0x70a08231 | balanceOf(address) |
0x313ce567 | decimals() |
0x06fdde03 | name() |
0x95d89b41 | symbol() |
0x18160ddd | totalSupply() |
0xa9059cbb | transfer(address,uint256) |
0x23b872dd | transferFrom(address,address,uint256) |
▶️ Only in ERC-5169 (2)
0x4bb30912 | scriptURI() |
0xe3d61eb3 | setScriptURI(string[]) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-20 · ERC-5169