ERC-20 vs ERC-5095

Token Standard compared with Principal Token.

No shared functions

0 shared · 9 vs 10 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-5095 lists ERC-20 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0xdd62ed3e`	`allowance(address,address)`
`0x095ea7b3`	`approve(address,uint256)`
`0x70a08231`	`balanceOf(address)`
`0x313ce567`	`decimals()`
`0x06fdde03`	`name()`
`0x95d89b41`	`symbol()`
`0x18160ddd`	`totalSupply()`
`0xa9059cbb`	`transfer(address,uint256)`
`0x23b872dd`	`transferFrom(address,address,uint256)`

`0x25a8d87d`	`convertToPrincipal(uint256)`
`0x1dc7f521`	`convertToUnderlying(uint256)`
`0x204f83f9`	`maturity()`
`0xd905777e`	`maxRedeem(address)`
`0xce96cb77`	`maxWithdraw(address)`
`0x4cdad506`	`previewRedeem(uint256)`
`0x0a28a477`	`previewWithdraw(uint256)`
`0xba087652`	`redeem(uint256,address,address)`
`0x6f307dc3`	`underlying()`
`0xb460af94`	`withdraw(uint256,address,address)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-20 · ERC-5095