ERC-20 vs ERC-4931
Token Standard compared with Generic Token Upgrade Standard.
No shared functions
0 shared · 9 vs 10 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
ERC-4931 lists ERC-20 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-20 (9)
0xdd62ed3e | allowance(address,address) |
0x095ea7b3 | approve(address,uint256) |
0x70a08231 | balanceOf(address) |
0x313ce567 | decimals() |
0x06fdde03 | name() |
0x95d89b41 | symbol() |
0x18160ddd | totalSupply() |
0xa9059cbb | transfer(address,uint256) |
0x23b872dd | transferFrom(address,address,uint256) |
▶️ Only in ERC-4931 (10)
0x37877c74 | computeDowngrade(uint256) |
0x2f6860ee | computeUpgrade(uint256) |
0xe0af487a | downgrade(address,uint256) |
0x5e5212c8 | isDowngradeActive() |
0x065f02db | isUpgradeActive() |
0x71ca337d | ratio() |
0xc752ff62 | totalUpgraded() |
0xe0622b27 | upgrade(address,uint256) |
0x04ccf6be | upgradeDestination() |
0xce7cc129 | upgradeSource() |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-20 · ERC-4931